☆ ☆ ½
Number
17 (1932) – A. Hitchcock
Through the murk of both picture and
soundtrack, it is still possible to make out that this is an Alfred Hitchcock
film. Sort of. The problem is that the Master seems
unfocused. He uses montage as well as he
ever did – to create a spoof of “the old dark house” genre, for example – but then
he leaves characters standing around in a group talking for what seems like
eons. This may be a result of the transition
to sound that meant that actors needed to hover under or around hidden
microphones – but Hitch had already demonstrated that he could be clever with
sound (e.g., Blackmail, 1929). Instead,
the root cause of the problem is probably the underlying play based on misrepresentation
and confusion of identities amongst criminals and detectives involved in the
theft of a necklace. I was confused too.
Leon M. Lion is along for cockney comic relief but the major attraction is a
finale which sees a bus and train rush pell-mell toward the Thames (I think)
with cops on one and robbers on the other until they barrel into a ferry and
the denouement begins. Unfortunately,
the whole thing is so clearly a set of models that suspension of disbelief is
impossible. But undoubtedly Hitch didn’t
care; fortunately, his best pictures were still ahead of him.
No comments:
Post a Comment